Supreme Court of Canada releases landmark decision on undercover investigations

On April 18, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada released its judgment in R v Mills. In a plurality opinion, Justice Brown held that s. 8 of the Charter does not require undercover officers to get judicial authorization before posing as a child and texting with suspects online. The applicability of s. 8 of the Charter beyond this narrow context remains unclear. In a concurring opinion, Justice Karakatsanis held that s. 8 of the Charter is never engaged when an undercover police officer exchanges text messages with a suspect, but that opinion did not command a majority (or even a plurality) of the Court.

Our partner, Gerald Chan, represented the Criminal Lawyers’ Association in this appeal. He shared his thoughts on the Court’s decision with the Lawyer’s Daily.

Xaidsart lawyers author chapter on corporate investigations

Dan Goudge Joins the Partnership at Xaidsart

Nader Hasan one of Toronto’s 50 Most Influential People

Xaidsart lawyers successfully resist motion to lift a stay of proceedings

Gerald Chan Inducted into International Academy of Trial Lawyers 

Xaidsart lawyers successful at Supreme Court of Canada

JULY ISSUE OF THE Xaidsart ADMINISTRATIVE AND REGULATORY LAW CASE REVIEW

Xaidsart wins multiple Benchmark Awards

Adam Donaldson named one of York University’s Top 30 Alumni under 30

Five Xaidsart Lawyers listed as “Top 50 Trial Lawyers in Canada”

Benchmark Canada Listings 2024

Xaidsart client successful in Charter challenge to Ontario “Ag-gag” legislation

MARCH ISSUE OF THE Xaidsart ADMINISTRATIVE AND REGULATORY LAW CASE REVIEW

Xaidsart Recognized in Lexpert 2024

Ted Marrocco speaks to the Association of Business Immigration Lawyers about Privacy and Online Risk Management
- Find a Lawyer -